
In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.
Thomas Jefferson - 3rd president of US (1743 - 1826)
The following post is related to free software, but you may find political statements in it that you might disagree. You have been warned.
I was born in Argentina in 1978, during a dictatorship. As such, I'm part of a stolen generation. Dozens of thousands of people were killed, and hundreds of babies and children were stolen and given to people linked to that dictatorship. I'm one of the lucky enough to have been raised by my biological parents, but that doesn't make me blind to what happened around me. Now, we could just say that was a brutal regime with a desire of violence per se, but that's not true at all and it leaves the root cause completely out of the equation.
As in most social and political problems, you should follow the money trail. Under that premise, you might find that the nations of the south cone (Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay) were the testbed for a brutal implementation of economic capitalism, which would ultimately lead to the government by corporations which we enjoy (or suffer) today in most modern countries. Small countries like mine are specially vulnerable to big corporations willing to strongarm governments into implementing policies to fill their pockets (certain seed corporation testing genetically modified soybeans without authorization and obtaining a waiver after the fact, software and medical patents royalties via international treaties, etc. There are more examples than I could enumerate in one blog). The fact is, we suffered a dictatorship to enable corporations to make more money than they would have made in a normal government, and the economists involved in it came back years later to finish their work and ensure the status quo.
As much as everybody would decry and denounce the political crimes, the economical ones have caused a lot more harm in the long term, with increased poverty, worsening education and health services, and very real victims in increased illiteracy, hunger, child mortality and overall decrease in life conditions for a big share of the population, which was mostly blind to the theft being perpretrated at gunpoint first and then behind excuses like "being a modern country" and "opening us to the capitalist market".
Milliions, billions of dollars were trasferred from regular people to the hands of a few, and over the years many promised to stop this, only to play the same game once again.
How is this related to free software from my point of view? First, it is developed by people. Even if it is largely funded by companies, not one company controls it, and its organic growth and evolution routinely escapes their control. It is a realm where you, me, us can regain control on what we do. If the future is the information society, then software is the new "means of production", and free software offers the opportunity to regain for use by everyone without being controlled by a single entity.
Then, working in the development of a personal finance manager, I can help people ease their financial strains. Any way I can find to make KMyMoney offer better information, a better insight on what's going on, a way for someone to control the budget and manage his/her income and expenses in a better way and move a little closer to break even or even to financial freedom, is a little victory to me, and to the whole team.
For personal reasons I have always refrained from entering politics, but using and developing free software is my own little personal political statement. Because the freedom I enjoy today has cost a lot of lifes, but it will not be complete until people are really free, not only politically but economically. You may say I'm a dreamer, but I owe that to all those who have come before me. It's my little homage to those who fought with real swords for freedom, to those of my generation who weren't as lucky as I was, to those who oppossed the gross theft we suffered.
So, besides my belief in technical superiority, a big love for the community I have encountered here, and the pleasure I find in developing and doing all the things I do for free software, this is one more reason why I'm here.
Disclaimer: since I know the kind of feelings this type of posts might ignite, the comments will be heavily moderated.
Comments
Nice
Well said. Any kind of action you take that involves other people can be thought as a political one, and participating in a FOSS community is of course a political stance. I appreciate your effort in letting people know what happened to South America during the end of the 60s and 70s: most people active in this community were born after this period, and do not know the extent of involvement of foreign governments with the military governments that were implemented during that time. Some countries here still feel the economic effects of that period, even after 40 years.
Mauricio Piacentini
Foreign involvement was extensive
Hello Mauricio!
The foreign involvement was extensive and deliberate. The torturers were trained by the CIA in the same techniques that were later used in Irak and Guantanamo. The economists were trained in Chicago and were known as the "Chicago Boys". The former paved the way for the latter to implement economic policies which would ensure the South Cone subordination to the developed countries. Both implemented shock therapies, some in a more literal way, but the economic shock therapy was extremely more harmful in the long term.
Thank You
Thank you for your impressive and incisive political views. I do not develop free software but as a user and promoter of free software I am thankful of the freedom it gives me. I think free software is part of the struggle for a freer more equal world.
The people of South America have become an inspiration to the rest of the world in overcoming their dictatorships and building more democratic and progressive societies.
Very nice!
Although I'm not born or raised in such a brute political climate as you, your thoughts on free software echoes mine. The difference being that I don't develop anything, I use and help others use free software as well.
helping others is part of the job
A lot of what I do has to do more with giving support and helping others than just plain development.
freedom
you have a critical consciousness seldom discussed in foss, i seriously congratulate you, although you have had to learn it bitterly from history first. now what i miss a bit here is the fact that foss today is not only a bit but in large parts (and still growing) used for capitalistic profit by large companies.
i especially like to emphasize here not only the ones seeable like oracle, novell or even google, which is a special case, but also all the other big ones like enron, gm, ... which are not that seeable. they all can use foss internally, even ripping parts as they like, to optimize their production (which is their property) for free and they don't have to and won't ever give sth. back, while software gets more and more important in production. in fact they actually had to pay developers e.g. from microsoft to do the job before, while now they take unpayed labour. google has been in criticism for some time to actually circumvent foss by not being a software vendor, but sell only the services around software which is largely contributed by the foss world, but does give back nothing of its actual core technological achievements, its heavily linux based search cluster technology.
now you claim that foss is an intelligble structure which actually guarantees that foss is not misused but benefits everybody in the end and it is therefore an easy political action to provide freedom for you... have you ever thought about the american military infrastructure to use foss to bomb and kill other people at this very moment? how do you think about a simple license which claims nothing more than to refuse any property on this software while it is actually ripped by the unbalanced world of property around it?
you say one cannot abondon property and cite rousseau, but why not keep a critical mindset and actually reflect historical materialism in its many forms and ask what property is and where its unproportional growth, called capital, comes from?
i'm a person who tries to share your problems and concerns and recognizes you as a person of the same world wide society in todays economical processes and still accepts that there might be large differences in our consciousness. i hope you don't get me wrong, i am not proposing (and not denying) easy left-wing political action, i am proposing critical reflection as a basis for people to come together and understand todays economical cooperation in its capitalistic form better.
at the very moment we as a world wide society understand this process (which no one alone can do as it involves so many people, both being subjects and objects of the process) we can decide what we do and leave capitalism as unselfdetermined bloody history behind us by doing what we already do best today, cooperate for each others richdom and freedom.
pete
p.s. i understand your political concerns as political discussions in foss are largely banned and imo relatively unreflected today. i am also a contributor to the kde codebase btw. but i have problems to see it as a path towards general "freedom" anymore... i still use and like it though and i propose it as an example of an alternative to capitalistic production of wares.
Freedom
Hi pete!
Licenses:
I think that copyleft is always useful. There are basically three important copyleft-licenses: LGPL, GPL and AGPL. In most cases the GPL could be replaced with the AGPL, but unfortunately in history companies like Google could avoid copyleft by providing web-services. Sometimes even the LGPL is useful. A widely used library is even better than a widely used proprietary library. I do not think that it is a problem when Free Software is used internally in capitalistic companies. Nobody can force them to contribute, but there are even a lot of contributing companies and it helps to spread it. I say internally, because it is a problem when copyleft is avoided or Free Software is replaced by an improved proprietary version.
Economy:
We will not get more freedom when we try to stop capitalism. For things like food, machines, commodities, credits, stocks and even employees (all the thing that can not be cheaply cloned) capitalism - free markets - are simply the onliest working system. Socialism failed. Anarchism failed. And even limitations like the EU-Agrar-market fail. That does not mean that states should not control externalization of costs with taxes or should not help branches making society better.
Software and knowledge are different. They can be shared and they can help everybody, even the economy. That is not bad. We are a part of the economy. Maybe there are a lot of companies developing proprietary software, "selling" knowledge or "using" patents. That is not liberal. Patens with a long life-time are against the competition we need. And we should not forget immaterial, academical values of shared knowledge. (I think most people interested in science or programming hate redumdance)
We need a pragmatic, idealistic, social and liberal policy: You need pragmatics to reach idealistic goals. And the words "social" and "liberal" belong together, if you want to reach freedom and fairness for everybody. (fairness != equility)
War:
I do not think that it is a valid argument to say "with Free Software you can make war". Unfortunately we have not overbeared war. But between Nato-members and some other countries war is not longer possible and I do not think that these nations could be defeated from outside. Most software in these environments is secret. Such software could help us in civil environments. But we should not forget nations like China or the Arabian Emirates becoming very powerful without democracy, without socialism, without any ideals (I'm waiting for revolutions). For most less developed countries special military software should not be usable because of missing ressources. E.g. reconaissance software would not help a country without air-planes or satelittes. But back to topic: Is it a problem when Al Qaida uses Drupal? Is it a problem when the Pentagon uses gcc? Andreconaissance or target-detection software is not free. But even for this software it would not be a problem in my opinion. An army can be responsible or not. But war is still a fact. (for example in general I do not decline the war in Afghanistan, but the strategy is wrong, the Nato should focus on rebuilding to make long term advantages, the "war against terrorism" fails)
Such arguments are comparable with arguments against privacy and encryption.
Relevance of Free Software:
Free Software and Free Knowledge are two aspects of a better world of freedom, fairness and even peace (patents even imply a lot of social problems). I am a Nerd. For me these aspects are very important. But you should have mentioned that I have ideals for other aspects of policy, too. My postulates are the importance of freedom for humans and a positive idea of man. Because of that I like Rousseau and I do not like Thomas Hobbes.
The User
:)
Nice text! I think that it would be the best situation for everybody if there would be only Free Software and Free Knowledge. (even for economy in long term - a word most companies do not seem to know)
-- The first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground, bethought himself of saying This is mine, and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society. From how many crimes, wars and murders, from how many horrors and misfortunes might not anyone have saved mankind, by pulling up the stakes, or filling up the ditch, and crying to his fellows, "Beware of listening to this impostor; you are undone if you once forget that the fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody."
Jean Jacques Rousseau
We do not want to remove ownership or money. That would be impossible without even more wars. But for software and knowledge we have a real chance to free them. Do not forget that the polity has to help us: Software patents were introduced and there is more and more academical research paid by the states without being published for everybody. These are unfair possibilities for companies and they are even bad for economy.
The User
Inspiring post
I feel the same way. Free Software helps to level the playing field between human beings and corporations.